Because of my internet problem, I couldn’t release
however this matter forced me personally to do this. We are building not so
much a multi racial society or a multi cultural society, we are building
separate societies which really don’t have much to do with other. Equipped with
just enough religion to hate those with another faith but not enough to love there
coreligionists – Pakistanis have mostly turned their backs on religious
atrocities. Religion is not to be, and was never, forced upon an individual
against their own will. Unfortunately
Pakistan is facing terrorism and some Islamic fundamentalists want to impose
their rigid rituals and rights and Pakistani government is in the state of
confusion weather to face them or to face terrorism. In this turmoil,
government is again wasting time to negotiate with them, knowingly that this
process will bring no solid result.
Taliban peacekeeping troops and government of
Pakistan negotiators are meeting to devise a strategy for formally
kick-starting a much-awaited dialogue process. The Taliban had nominated five
prominent figures – Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf - PTI Chairman Imran Khan, Jamiat
Ullma-e-Islam- JUI-S chief Maulana Sami ul Haq, Jamaat-e-Islamai JI leader
Prof. Mohammad Ibrahim, JUI-F politician Mufti Kifayat ullah and Lal Masjid
prayer leader Maulana Abdul Aziz to act as intermediaries between them and the
government’s negotiating team. But JUI and PTI – the two avid supporters of
peace talks wished the proposed dialogue luck and excused themselves from the
Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan’s intermediary committee. And now Taliban will be nominate
Insar Abbasi and Oriay Maqbool Jan in the squad.
Fawad Chaudhry, one of the PPP political leaders
has demanded that people nominated by Taliban for negotiations should be
arrested and investigated for their links with terrorists. I support his stance
because once these people are living in the country and if they are
representing the militant groups and will negotiate on their behalf it means
that they are one of them either in spirit or practical.
Asian Study Group, in collaboration with Kuch
Khass, arranged a multimedia presentation on Religious Tolerance & Islam. They
believe that many mistakenly believe that Islam does not tolerate the existence
of other religions. Islam recognizes that there are a plurality of religions on
this earth, and gives the right to individuals to choose the path which they
believe to be true. They gave the examples from the life of their Prophet
(PBUH) epitomize the verse of the Quran which promotes religious tolerance and
sets the guideline for Muslims’ interaction with people of other faiths.
I am not a religious scholar but I know about my
faith and very well aware of it as well. I wanted them to ask, which Sharia you
wanted to impose, either the Taliban design or what about the Sharia which is
already imposed in the constitution of the Pakistan or both? I feel it is
already scripted and its net shell is; both groups will sit and negotiate and
design some restrictions to be imposed on margined position in the society like
women and religious minorities. It may demand to tighten the rope and neck of
the minorities like poised to make death penalty compulsory for blasphemy.
Earlier Pakistan faces a looming deadline to either comply with a court ruling
to amend the country’s penal code to make the death penalty the only lawful
punishment for blasphemy or to appeal the order. It may restrict religious
freedom or freedom of expression. It is already practice that religious
minorities are not leading healthy life in this arena. I am afraid that
Pakistani Christians are already living miserable life and do not have right to
be heard and if the government shot the bullet putting on Taliban shoulders,
what will be Christian future in the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment